General Economy
Lots of marketing is being done by Government to attract investors. Modi is playing relentless tireless cheerleader for India - a true capitalist PM and seems to be putting our best foot forward. Some ambitious projects
are being promoted by Government– like the 1 lac MW solar project. For more,
check this jazzy presentation by
Government – 200 days of power minister’s achievements. Solar is aggressively being pushed and made mandatory for
buildings in Haryana. With such initiatives, if implemented, things look good for India.
Oil downfall is another good news for India, as well as for other consuming countries. With oil reaching $50, Indians couldnt have asked for more. Although not passed to consumer, it is still benefiting government to manage the deficit.
At same time, the fall in soft and hard commodities will
reduce incomes for many players, esp. farmers. Rural economy is facing decline
as observed by few farmers. The prices of many crops – cotton, rice, wheat,
sugar, maize, etc - this season are very low. Even the source of easy
money for farmers , viz. the land sale –
is on decline, as no more aggressive land buying is done by Industry or real
estate developers. Overall reduction in
farmers' income is visible in decline in agricultural equipments/tractor sale. This doesnt bode well.
Hope, the dope!
A part of market, sectors like consumption, which were expensive last year, have become psychotic this year. Seems like desperate money/newbies facing deprival super-reaction are chasing and buying in panic. Few companies have shown ZERO growth over past 6 years - zero, nil, nada, zilch!!! - and currently hyped up to justify 60x pe!! Another one, sells at 70x pe, 12x sales! Pied Pipers are playing and rats are high on opium.
Its easy to digress from one's strategy at such times, and get swayed by sexy sirens. The landscape look easy, but it is actually full of landmines.
YOU as The Chief Manager
The question often arises, what if market tanks down from
this level. Secondly, if it falls, do we see absolute crash like 1929?
My take is 1929 kind of situations are averted lately by easy
money from the Feds. It has set up a entitlement assumption amongst fund
managers that Government will protect the economy/markets no matter what. This is
what we saw in last credit crises.
So,
if not an absolute blowout, how do we manage minor setbacks? AND at the same
time, how do we think about the scenario where the market goes in opposite
direction and becomes fairytale bull runs for 2/3/5 years? My answer is by
becoming your own prudent asset allocator.
Time again, we have seen that assets, no matter what, over
time, fetch higher valuations provided managements don’t swindle. There would
be many buses for each bus missed, but the ticket price every year would
escalate. Buffett was right when he said that compounding should start as early
as possible – and asset acquisition should be done aggressively early on.
It makes sense to
take consistent additional exposure in assets, with inflows from earning income
(or dividends, or insurance float/debt as in case of Buffett). Managing fixed allocation, with some idle
cash on balance sheet is not a great strategy for personal
allocations. Rather, being fully in equities, and keep adding additional capital
in rising economy, is the way to be (keeping an eye on valuations ofcourse).
Similarly, adding when the markets tank, and successively take float/leverage,
if possible (keeping in view on markets) on way down, could be much better
policy. Again, nothing is absolute gospel – a careful vigil needs to be kept
throughout. But one must keep take reins of one’s financial destiny.
Oppurtunities in a Bull run
This is second most prominent question asked. The
answer resides in part in the above section - i.e. managing one's allocations. Its impossible to predict the run
of a bull market, or a downfall. The only way is to buy cheapest wherever
possible and keep a dynamic allocation, as described above. There is no dearth
of opportunities in an upwards markets too. For years, markets can remain high (or low)
than one’s wildest expectations – the only way out is to develop multiple
skills/earning streams and keep allocating periodically.
I was buying some company last year. This year, I'm still
buying it at 3-4x original price because the valuations have moved ahead and growth
has accelerated and is visible. So, anchoring to original buy price is WRONG criteria.
RIGHT thing is to anchor to the moving intrinsic value and keep allocation a dynamic process.
As they say, Investing is simple, but not easy.
Etc
Found some interesting stats from different fund managers’
way of investing. Below is a pullout from Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme
presentation. This is to point out the concentration being followed in his
fund, where top security is almost half of the fund. Similar point was recently
made by Pabrai at an investing summit in Mumbai, please enjoy the interesting conversation here.